1.5 – Discussion: NTSB Organization
1313 unread
replies.7979 replies.
I. Answer the
following, along with any additional questions your Instructor may post, in
this discussion forum.
·
Explain the concept
that the NTSB is “independent.” Thence, define the scope and purpose of the
Party System.
II. Vague, short
answers absent of detailed qualifications will not be accepted. Support your
opinions with references. You may use course material, but be specific.
Personal experiences, etc. may be used to enhance your perspective on the
question, but they must be valid and relative to the subject matter. Your
instructor will evaluate your posts using the Discussion Rubric
(PDF) also accessible
under Resources.
III. Read the posts of
your classmates and reply, evaluating at least one other student’s post.
Discussions are worth 15% of your final grade.
SFTY330 module 2.6 discussion latest 2016 may
2.6 – Discussion: Pilot Error and Crash Lab Observations
5555 unread
replies.7575 replies.
I. Answer the
following questions in this discussion forum, along with any additional
questions your Instructor may post.
1. Pilot Error: Does the phrase “pilot error”
really tell us anything about accidents? Is this a cause or a blame issue? What
are the elements that define an “error” which might be important to the
investigator?
2. Crash Lab Observations: What were the weather
conditions during the approach to landing and did the flight profile seem
normal?
II. A substantial
response shows thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence
response is not acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use
course material, but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to
enhance your perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to
the subject matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the Discussion Rubric
(PDF).
III. Read the posts of
your classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330 module 3.5 discussion latest 2016 may
3.5 – Discussion: Organizational Culture and Crash Lab
7272 unread
replies.7676 replies.
I. Answer the
following questions in this discussion forum, along with any additional
questions your Instructor may post.
1. Culture: Can management or organizational
culture actually cause a mishap? If this is true, then provide examples of
“paper trails” an investigator would need to examine that would support this
alleged causation or influence to an accident.
2. Crash Lab Observations: Was the accident site
consolidated into a localized area and were all the parts of the plane there,
as best as you can tell? It may help to include a brief introduction of your
work.
II. A substantial
response shows thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence
response is not acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use
course material, but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to
enhance your perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to
the subject matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the Discussion Rubric
(PDF).
III. Read the posts of
your classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330 module 4.4 discussion latest 2016 may
4.4 – Discussion: Fire Sources
2121 unread
replies.7171 replies.
I. Answer the
following question, along with any additional questions your Instructor may
post.
·
Can you think of
various fire sources (other than fuel related) that may be of investigative
concern? Provide an example.
II. A substantial
response shows thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence
response is not acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use
course material but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to
enhance perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to the
subject matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the Discussion Rubric
(PDF).
III. Read the posts of
your classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330 module 5.5 discussion latest 2016 may
5.5 – Discussion: Turbines and Crash Lab
7676 unread
replies.7979 replies.
I. Answer the
following questions in this discussion forum, along with any additional
questions your Instructor may post.
1. Turbines: What is meant in the Air Detective
Tip by, “Turbines have a memory?” How does that relate to an investigation?
2. Crash Lab Observations: What was the purpose
and importance of the witness interviews and based on your readings, were these
interviews helpful?
II. A substantial
response shows thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence
response is not acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use
course material, but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to
enhance your perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to
the subject matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the Discussion Rubric
(PDF).
III. Read the posts of
your classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330 module 6.4 discussion latest 2016 may
6.4 – Discussion: Structural Failure and Crash Lab
3030 unread
replies.7979 replies.
I. Answer the following
questions in this discussion forum, along with any additional questions your
Instructor may post
1. Structural Fatigue: Structural fatigue can be
associated with pilot induced overload, but can you think of other factors that
have induced a failure in the structure of an aircraft?
2. Crash Lab Observations: Did you detect any
obvious failure modes or conditions that may have affected the flight?
II. A substantial
response shows thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence
response is not acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use
course material, but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to
enhance your perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to
the subject matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the Discussion Rubric
(PDF).
III. Read the posts of
your classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330 module 7.5 discussion latest 2016 may
7.5 – Discussion: GA Aircraft and Crash Lab
5151 unread
replies.6060 replies.
I. Answer the
following questions in this discussion forum, along with any additional questions
your Instructor may post.
1. Data Recorders: Consider that many general
aviation aircraft now have glass cockpits with no impact resistant data
recorders. Should personal use aircraft be required to have some form of flight
data recorders?
2. Crash Lab Observations: What does CREEP stand
for and did you detect any obvious signatures revealing issues with
survivability?
II. A substantial
response shows thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence
response is not acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use
course material, but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to
enhance your perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to
the subject matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the Discussion Rubric
(PDF).
III. Read the posts of
your classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330 module 8.7 discussion latest 2016 may
8.7 – Discussion: NTSB Report on Icing Accident and Crash Lab
2323 unread
replies.5959 replies.
I. Answer the
following questions in this discussion forums, along with any additional
questions your Instructor may post.
1. Icing Accident: Opine to the major issue in
the Roselawn, IN. (NTSB AAR-9601) icing accident. Was it the unique ice, crew
issue, or an aircraft design flaw? Did the aircraft manufacturer (BEA) agree
with this report? Do you agree with the recommendations? In this case,
references are not required.
2. Crash Lab Observations: Based on what you have
seen can you establish any causation? Do you see any similarities between the
accident simulation and another accident discussed in this course?
II. A substantial
response shows thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence
response is not acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use
course material, but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to
enhance your perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to
the subject matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the Discussion Rubric
(PDF).
III. Read the posts of
your classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330 module 9.1 discussion latest 2016 may
9.1 – Discussion: Accident Investigation
4949 unread
replies.6363 replies.
I. Answer the
following question, along with any additional questions your Instructor may
post in this forum.
Accident
Investigation: Explain how aircraft accident investigation is both a reactive
and yet proactive process.
II. A substantial response
shows thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence response is
not acceptable. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the Discussion Rubric
(PDF).
III. Read the posts of
your classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330 module
5.6 assignment latest 2016 may
Graded Assignment
For your first
required written project you assessed the NTSB Accident Report in terms of
human factor errors by using the HFAC model and wrote a case study that
identifies several key human factor failures and explains how each human factor
in the accident may have contributed to another failure that ultimately created
an error chain. Your paper should be a well-written APA formatted report, 4-5
pages in length, plus a title page and abstract page and follow the guidelines
provided in theProject Room.
Grading
Grading is based on
proper APA style, format and language and the ability to clearly illustrate the
error sequence within the accident profile. Review the information on this
assignment in the Project Room and
verify your paper addresses all of the project requirements. Your instructor
will evaluate your project using the evaluation rubric linked in the Project
Room. Your project is worth 15% of your final grade.
Important
Upon submission, your
work will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin (Links to an external site.), a
plagiarism detection tool. Your paper will be checked against a database of
millions of written works and provide feedback on originality. You may view
your originality report; however, you will not be permitted to submit your
paper a second time. Ensure your work is entirely your own and cite your
sources!
Before submitting your
assignment, save your file using the following naming convention:
lastname_HFProject (e.g., lindbergh_HFProject.docx) and submit your document
using the Submit Assignment link to the upper right.
No comments:
Post a Comment